The Public Would Rather Watch Hockey! The Promises and Institutional Challenges of ‘Doing’ Public Criminology within the Academy

Carrie B Sanders, Lauren Eisler

Abstract


While there has been growing academic dialogue concerning the need for, and value of, public criminology there has been little beyond theorizing and hypothesizing as to how one could actually ‘do’ public criminology. With this in mind, we set out to address this gap by implementing a departmental initiative that brought students into a for-credit course that was also open to the general public. This paper focuses on this enterprise and examines the promises and subsequent challenges of ‘doing’ public criminology within the academy. We deconstruct the academic and institutional shift toward ‘public’ engagement and intellectualism to better understand the “science-politics nexus†operating in criminology. We begin with a discussion of the present debates concerning public criminology and follow with a description of our public criminology colloquium series. We then discuss the promises and challenges we faced in the implementation of the colloquium and conclude by reflecting on how these personal challenges are representative of the broader institutional and organizational challenges facing public criminology.


Keywords


articulation, democratic underlabourer, public criminology, science-politics nexus, synthesis

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Barak, Gregg. 2007. “Doing newsmaking criminology from within the academy Theoretical Criminology 11: 191-207.

Becker, Howard S. 1967. “Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14: 239-247.

Becker, Howard S. 2003. Making Society Relevant to Society. Paper presented at the meeting of The European Sociological Association, Murcia, Spain.

Becker, Howard S. 1995. “The power of inertia†Qualitative Sociology, 18: 30-309.

Bender, Thomas 1997 . Intellect and Public Life The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.

Bourdieau, P. and Wacquant, L. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brady, David. 2004. “Why Public Sociology May Fail†Social Forces 82(4): 1629-1638.

Braithwaite, John 2005. “For public social science†The British Journal of Sociology 56(3): 345-393.

Burawoy, Michael 2012. “Forward†pp. x-xi in Nyden, Philip, Hossfeld, Leslie, and Nyden, Gwendoly (Eds.) Public Sociology: Research, Action, and Change. Sage publications: London.

Burawoy, Michael 2004a. “For Public Sociology†American Sociological Review 70(1): 4-28.

Burawoy, Michael 2004b. “Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and Possibilities†Social Forces 82(4): 1603-1618.

Burawoy, Michael, William Gamson, Charlotte Ryan, Stephen Pfohl, Diane Vaughan, Charles Derber, dn Juliet Schor. 2004. “Public sociologies: A symposium from Boston College. Social Problems, 51: 103-130.

Carrabine, L. Maggy Lee, Nigel South.(2000) “Social Wrongs and Human Rights in Late Modern Britain: Social Exclusion, Crime Control, and Prospects for a Public Criminology.†Social Justice, Vol. 27, No. 2

Chancer, L. and McLaughlin, E. 2007. ‘Public Criminologies: Diverse perspectives on academia and policy. Theoretical Criminology 11: 155-173.

Currie, Elliott. 2007. “Against Marginality: Arguments for a public criminology†Theoretical Criminology 11(2): 175-190.

Ericson, R.V. 1991. “Mass media, crime, law, and justice†British Journal of Criminology 31: 219–49.

Feilzer, Martina. 2009. “The Importance of Telling a Good Story: An Experiment in Public Criminology†The Howard Journal 48(5): 472-484

Freire, Paulo. 2011. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Garland, D. 2001. The Culture of Control. IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Garland, D. and Sparks, R 2000. “Criminology, Social Theory and the Challenge of Our Times, British Journal of Criminology 40(2): 189-204.

Kalleberg, Ragnvald 2005. “What is ‘public sociology’? Why and how should it be made stronger?†The British Journal of Sociology 56(3): 387-393.

Loader, Ian and Sparks, Richard 2010. “What is to be done with public criminology? Criminology and Public Policy 9(4): 771-781.

Loader, I. and Sparks, R. 2010. Public Criminology? London: Routledge.

Nielsen, Francois. 2004. “The Vacant “weâ€: Remarks on Public Sociology†Social Forces 82(4): 1619-1627.

Rock, Paul. 2010. “Comment on “Public Criminologies†Criminology and Public Policy 9(4): 751-767.

Ruggiero, Vincenzo. 2012. “How public is public criminology?†Crime Media Culture 8(2): 151-160.

Ruggiero, Vincenzo. 2010. Penal Abolition. Oxford University Press: New York.

Schneider, Christopher. 2011. Public Sociology Course Outline. BC: University of British Columbia.

Stevens, Sharon McKenzie. 2008. “Speaking Out: Toward an Institutional Agenda for Refashioning STS Scholars as Public Intellectuals.†Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol.33,No.6: 730-753.

Tittle, Charles. 2004. “The Arrogance of Public Sociology†Social Forces 82(4): 1639-1643.

Uggen, Christopher and Inderbitzin, Michelle 2010. “Public Criminologies†American Society of Criminology 9(4): 725-749.

Wacquant, Loic 2011. “From ‘Public Criminology’ to the reflexive sociology of criminological production and consumption: A Review of Public Criminology?†British Journal of Criminology 51: 438-448.

Young, Jock. 2011. The Criminological Imagination Cambridge: Polity Press.

Zimring, F. 1996. “Populism, Democratic Government and the Decline of Expert Authority: Some Reflections of “Three Strikes†in Californiaâ€, Pacific Law Journal 28(1): 243-56.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Attribution to include the author or artist's name, date of first publication,
and the name of our journal: Radical Criminology.
ISSN 1929-7904
(Print) | ISSN 1929-7912 (Online)

SaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSave